January 10th, 2012

Human knowledge, brought to you by . . .

By Ezra Klein
Washington Post

For much of the 19th century, newspapers were financed by political parties. It was a transparent, transactional relationship: The newspaper would officially partner with a political party, and in return it received direct infusions of cash, customers and even news. The cash would come from the party’s budget, the customers from the party’s base and the news from the party’s politicians. In return, the party had total control over what the newspaper did and didn’t publish.

Yet by the end of the 20th century, there were hardly any party-affiliated newspapers left. The news found a more lucrative patron than political parties: advertisers. This business model, though, required a different news model. “If the profitability of advertising is high, then it is costly for media outlets to distort their news coverage in the direction desired by a subsidizing group,” Petrova writes. “Any deviation from the coverage that maximizes audience means the loss of audience and the loss of corresponding advertising revenues.”

Read more: http://wapo.st/worV8J

Comments

Add your own Comment

(optional)